A recent Supreme Court judgment allowing dual taxation on television broadcasting services could significantly increase the tax burden on digital entertainment platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and gaming apps, according to tax experts and legal professionals, a report in The Economic Times stated yesterday.
The May 22 verdict, passed by a bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and NK Singh in the Asianet Satellite Communications and Others case, clarified that the act of broadcasting can be considered as two separate taxable activities — delivery of service and delivery of entertainment. As a result, both the Centre and state governments can impose separate taxes: service tax by the Centre and entertainment tax by the states.
The Economic Times report stated this dual-taxation model, although originating from a pre-GST era case, could have far-reaching implications for the current digital landscape.
“The ruling is mainly premised on the basis that both taxes deal with different aspects of broadcasting activities and hence, there is no overlap in taxing powers of the Centre and state,” said Saloni Roy, Partner, Deloitte India.
She added that the decision, despite relating to an earlier tax regime, introduces uncertainty in the industry and may influence current tax structures.
While GST was meant to streamline taxation, some states have already enacted their own laws allowing local bodies to impose entertainment duties.
Odisha mulls starting TV channel dedicated to Lord Jagannath
MIB extends by 4 weeks ban on news channels’ TRP by BARC India
Reliance eyes LEO satellite play to rival Starlink in India: ET report
FIFA offered $20mn for WC’26 broadcast rights for India market
KPMG in India, CleverTap partner to boost customer engagement
IPL 2026 becomes biggest season yet with record reach
Shemaroo celebrates Mother’s Day with ‘MAA’dness’ campaign
Anant V Joshi replaces Vaibhav Raj Gupta in ‘Gullak’ S5
Omnicom Media wins Netflix India’s Rs 300 cr media mandate 

