A recent Supreme Court judgment allowing dual taxation on television broadcasting services could significantly increase the tax burden on digital entertainment platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and gaming apps, according to tax experts and legal professionals, a report in The Economic Times stated yesterday.
The May 22 verdict, passed by a bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and NK Singh in the Asianet Satellite Communications and Others case, clarified that the act of broadcasting can be considered as two separate taxable activities — delivery of service and delivery of entertainment. As a result, both the Centre and state governments can impose separate taxes: service tax by the Centre and entertainment tax by the states.
The Economic Times report stated this dual-taxation model, although originating from a pre-GST era case, could have far-reaching implications for the current digital landscape.
“The ruling is mainly premised on the basis that both taxes deal with different aspects of broadcasting activities and hence, there is no overlap in taxing powers of the Centre and state,” said Saloni Roy, Partner, Deloitte India.
She added that the decision, despite relating to an earlier tax regime, introduces uncertainty in the industry and may influence current tax structures.
While GST was meant to streamline taxation, some states have already enacted their own laws allowing local bodies to impose entertainment duties.
India programming careful blend of art, science: Netflix’s Shergill
ICC warns Pak Cricket Board of legal action against it by JioStar
Dream Sports firm FanCode bags ISL global broadcast rights
Guest Column: Budget’s policy interventions to boost Orange Economy
Alphabet crosses $400 bn revenue mark for the first time in 2025
‘Mastiii 4’ emerges a must-watch title on ZEE5
‘Mirzapur: The Movie’ to hit theatres on Sept 4
Prime Video curates 13 films, series to set the mood this Valentine’s Day
Tata Play Binge streams ICC T20 WC 2026 across screens 

