The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (Meity) in its 101-page statement of objections before the Karnataka High Court has termed the microblogging platform Twitter of being defiant of the laws of the land.

The case is slated to be heard on September 8. MeitY filed its statement of objections to the court on Thursday.

In the objections, the Centre or the federal government said, “The petitioner deliberately remained non-compliant and defiant to the laws of the land. Only on the diligent follow up of the respondent No.2 and upon the issuance of show cause notice dated 27.06.2022 the Petitioner, for reasons best known to it, suddenly complied with all the blocking directions.”

Twitter has challenged the many blocking directions issued to it, including 39 URLs. Twitter in its petition in June had claimed that freedom of speech is affected by the takedown notices of the government. The originators of the content on its platform were not issued notices before their content was asked to be taken down, PTI reported from Bengaluru, capital of the southern Indian State of Karnataka.

However, the government in its objections has said that since Twitter was the intermediary, it was its responsibility to inform the users.

The government has also said that Twitter has no role to play in the security of the country.

“When a public order issue arises, it is the government that is responsible to take action and not the platform. Hence, whether content will cause national security or public order issues or not should not be allowed to be determined by the platforms,” the government stated.

On the claims that political tweets were asked to be taken down, the government has stated that it had only asked for unverified accounts to be blocked.

The Centre has stated that any private policy or rules made by online platforms are subject to the Information Technology Act 2000. “Foreign platforms providing services in the country shall not be entitled to claim that the Indian laws and rules are not applicable upon them. Any such claim is legally untenable,” it has said.

The objections have also called for dismissal of the petition as Twitter is not entitled to seek relief as it is not a citizen of India.

“Article 21 rights are not available to artificial juristic entities, much less, to any foreign commercial entity. The present petition even if it attempts to allege breach of Article 21 rights, is therefore, not maintainable at the instance of the petitioner foreign company,” the objection stated.